patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Union Files Grievances on Behalf of Drinking Mailmen

Three mailmen have been placed on emergency leave in the matter.

 

The union that represents mail carriers has filed grievances on behalf of three mailmen who were placed on leave without pay after they were found to have been drinking on the job.

U.S. Postal Service management filed for the removal of Rudy Gray, Melvin Ingram and a third mail carrier. In the meantime, it placed the men on emergency leave, which prohibits them from working or from being paid.

But National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) Branch 157, which represents the men, filed a grievance against management's actions, according to union officials, who spoke during a Mt. Airy-Nippon-Bryan-Cresheim Town Watch meeting Thursday. The town watch has been working to potentially get Gray—who delivered mail in that neighborhood—reinstated.

Mt. Airy Patch was not present at the town watch meeting, per the union's request. But union and town watch officials relayed information from the meeting after its conclusion.

Gray and Ingram, who regularly delivered mail throughout parts of Mt. Airy until recently, were the subjects of a FOX 29 investigative report, during which the station's team brought hidden cameras into McMenamin's Tavern that captured the two drinking multiple beers while on the clock before heading to their vehicles to begin their routes.

Ingram delivered mail on the 300 block of Wellesley Road, among other places, and the third mailman, whose name has not been released and who was not directly a subject of FOX's piece, delivered on Phil-Ellena Street and elsewhere.

NALC Branch 157 President Randy Zebin, who was at Thursday's meeting and is working on the matter, said all three are postal service veterans and each have at least 17 years of experience. This is the first offense for all three of them.

At this point, he said, the union is trying to open up the lines of communication with management. It doesn't know how things will go—the matter could potentially be settled in some form or could go through an arbitration process.

Zebin also said the union has encouraged the men to attend an alcohol rehabilitation program available. But the NALC branch doesn't know if the rehab will be mandatory if the mail carriers are reinstated, since that depends on what's negotiated.

The town watch has worked to put together a petition in support of Gray, and neighbors from other areas, such as those from the 300 block of Wellesley Road, have done the same. Several neighbors from that block came to the meeting.

It's the town watch, though, that's spearheading the petition collection effort. It will take copies of any petition or letter from residents in support of the mailmen and will forward them on to the union.

The town watch issued a collective statement at the conclusion of Thursday's meeting.

"The three letter carriers are part of our community, and we care about them," it said. "They made mistakes and admit that what they did was wrong. We believe that they deserve a second chance."

The mailmen worked out of Germantown Station at 5209 Greene St. The postal service has declined comment on the matter, saying it doesn't discuss administrative actions taken.

Ray Haupt

5:35 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I am baffled by this story. Why is Town Watch at all involved in this affair on behalf of postal workers who were drinking on the job, not attending to their duties, and perhaps even being a danger to the community it they were impaired by drinking?

If neighbors wish to petition on behalf of the mailmen that is fine, but in my view the Town Watch image is tarnished by this particular activism?

Reply
Comment_arrow

e

6:48 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

The drinking was only part of the problem. It was the falsifying on the scan points that they are also really in trouble.

Tami

4:43 am on Wednesday, March 9, 2011

I am all for second chances.. But it's not like they only drank one afternoon, it's been continuous. Many days in that bar drinking. And then DRIVE...Putting everyone in their path at risk. That's the worse part to me.

Reply

Robin

10:06 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

If they were involved in an accident, and someone was injured or killed, the postal service would never hear the end of it, and be held responsible for allowing it to happen. FIRE them.

Reply

Matthew Feldman

11:32 am on Thursday, March 10, 2011

We should all be allowed to drink, drive, and do our jobs, especially federal employees.

Reply
Comment_arrow

luvalo

9:49 am on Saturday, March 12, 2011

That's exactly a union idoits reply. Sure, ALL drink/drive and you know you DON"t DO your job Matthew. Who are YOU kidding ? !! Nice image you portray for the rest of us Postal, or Federal workers. Thanks knucklehead.

Edward

12:39 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

They were being paid well to do a job. They broke the law, they were not doing their job, and they put the public in harms way. They do not deserve a second chance. They are adults and know what is right and what is wrong. The Postal Service and the Union Reps need to let these guys go. It sends the wrong message.

Reply

Postman69

12:48 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

The Union Reps have to defend all letter carriers if not then unfair labor practice laor charges could be brought against them. The charge would be non representation which could cost the local Union officials fines and jail time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

luvalo

9:52 am on Saturday, March 12, 2011

PULLL-EEEEZE!!! What an excuse. You defend them, while I got to HAVE to do parts of their route b/c YOU defend them, and they screw off everyday, or every day they MIGHT show up for work. "Oh there's so much mail" or "that route's too hard". Why the heck did you apply for a letter carrier job then? LEAVE!!!

D Armstrong

1:00 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

Yupp, got to defend the unexecusable. Frankly, as a member of the NALC I find these guys to be guilty, and in need of termination. There is no excuse for bringing shame and dishonor upon the hard working honest letter carriers that work hard and provide honest service to postal patrons. All of these guys knew exactly what they were doing. The know that drinking and driving is illegal on or off the job. They endangered everyone with their behavior to begin with, and in addition commited a crime in falsifying scan reports to cover thier consumption of booze while on duty and in uniform. Shred the petitions, give them due process and fire them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

luvalo

9:41 am on Saturday, March 12, 2011

Exactly D.armstrong. Would the Town Watch defended them if they struck another, car or person? They signed a Code of Ethics when they were hired.So every police officer should excuse EVERY drinking drver on the grounds of the NALC defense? I feel like you. I'm a retired 30 year USPS worker, I've seen how the NALC says "We have to defend them or be sued for not". So the NALC truly defends the poor to mediocre employee for fear of,what? I also understand they falsified official records(scan points/times). Of course the NALC will defend that too, correct?
Over the last 7 years of my carrier operation employ, I've seen the NALC destroy any standards of an honest,hard working carrier. The slugs get the route cuts, and I have to assist in finishing their route b/c THEY are too busy screwing off. Thanks to the NALC for making me get so disgusted, I retired.I reported to work everyday while the NALC DEFENDS the ones that are always OUT, and I have to do parts of their route while NALC defends their POOR attendance records. So i miss my grandkids ball games b/c I HAVE to work o/t to do the "slugs' job.

Kbob

1:21 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

The union has a responsiblity to defend these members but if and when it goes to arbitration these guys will be back working. The system is broken, I personally have seen where arbitrations have given thieves their job back because the amount they stole was considered insignificant. I have seen where carriers that have lost their licenses have been kept in the carrier craft and management had to drive the employees to their park and loop points as per union settlements. Management can't even put carriers in the clerk craft while their licenses are pulled. Unions still serve a good and useful purpose but the field is stacked in the unions favor. The employees can go through the grievance procedure, if that is not working out they can file an EEO in conjunction with their grievance and at a certain level they can opt to go the MSP route. Management basically does a lousy job at step 1 & 2 and the UMPS process is a joke the union eats managements lunch 9 times out of ten. Supervisors and managers have to do their daily job and on top of that they have to do the step 1 and 2's and for the most part they don't have the time or the necessary information to do a good job at each level. The union rep is allowed to have paid time to gather facts and put together his or her case. I feel sorry for the good letter carriers and clerks that get tarred by the unprofessional and poor employees who manage to keep their jobs because of the lop sided labor management system.

Reply
Comment_arrow

luvalo

9:44 am on Saturday, March 12, 2011

Kbob, you said it all. I've watched so many co-worker carriers screwuing off ALL day, and they get defended by NALC and every which way. I've been the VICTIM of picking up their workload. I even saw a carrier dump all their mail, get caught, and get reinstated!! With FULL back pay.

harold lyles

1:25 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

This is stupid, the NALC refuses to fight for members in situations where they've won grievances in the past and will win again, but they'll waste time ,money and energy for these BUMS. I left the NALC after 17 years and do not regret it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

luvalo

9:46 am on Saturday, March 12, 2011

I was an NALC member for three years and dropped out b/c of how they protect the KRAP.Union reps, "If it was YOU, you'd want our defense". I LAUGHED so hard, my reply, "It would NEVER be ME you'd have to defend"

Tony

3:50 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

The Union officials are sworn to uphold the contract, the swearing in as an official of the Union does not entitle nor require a person to be a perpitrators criminal defense attorney. These people broke the law. There is a big difference in union members breaking the law and management violating the contract. If management violated the contract based on what they did to the carriers then fine, otherwise the Union is not obligated to represent anyone!!!!

Reply

JJ Kunz

4:26 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

What if these were cops on thier local beat? Or Ambulance drivers?
C'mon people....lets act like adults, if they ran over a kid playing in the street what would you be saying?

Reply

marty

4:29 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

The postal Service needs a good cleansing... They need to get rid of the bums and show appreciation for the good employees. They also need to get real management skills and stop promoting the flunkees.

Reply

MS. LA

6:18 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

THIS IS A NO BRAINER ... THESE MEN BROKE ALL THE RULES ... OF COURSE, THEY SHOULD BE FIRED AND APWU HAS NO BUSINESS WASTING OUR TIME AND MONEY REPRESENTING THEM BUT IT DOESN'T SURPRISE ME AT ALL. I AM NOT A DRUNK OR A LIAR AND I CAN NOT EVEN GET APWU TO FILE A LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCE ON MY BEHALF. AGAIN, THIS IS WHY USPS IS IN THE SHAPE IT IS IN AND APWU IS GOING DOWN THE TOILET. LET THESE THIEVES GO PLEASE AND WASTE NO TIME DOING IT!!!

Reply

ALFRED LAI

7:38 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

SHAME ON THE UNION. THEY SHOULD NOT FILE GRIEVANCE ON BEHALF OF THEM. CUSTOMERS ON THESE TWO ROUTES HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED AND CONSIDER THEY ARE DOING AN HONORABLE DEED FOR THEIR LIVEHOOD AND FAMILY. IT IS ALL B.S. ONCE YOU BREAK THE LAW, YOU HAVE TO SUFFER WHATEVER CONSEQUENCES THAT MIGHT HAVE COME TO YOU. WISCONSIN IS DOING THE RIGHT THING TO STRIP AWAY THEIR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHT.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

RETIRED

8:00 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

IF they have any smarts they will RETIRE OR RESIGN,there isn't any arbitrators in this country that would give them a second chance.They were STEALING TIME AND MONEY,FALSIFING US POSTAL DOCUMENTS,NO WAY WILL YOU GET THE POSTAL SERVICE TO PUT THEM BACK TO WORK. THEY LET ALL THEIR PATRONS DOWN AND THEIR FELLOW EMPLOYEES,THEY ARE HISTORY...

Reply

jim jackson

9:20 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

If they allow these lowlifes to get their jobs back, then everybody else will be able to walk into a bar and have a few drinks and then say if they are caught, "well, we deserve a second chance just like the three letter carriers in philadelphia did."

Reply

homeboyroy

10:06 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

Talk about being caught with your pants down - the reason FOX 29 was able to get these guys dirty was this wasn't the first time they were drinking on duty (my assumption). It makes me wonder about the amount and quality of street supervision in this office - this story is about sloppy management along with employee misdeeds. Too bad it had to make it on television - most employees don't do this crap.

Reply

Larry

10:58 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

All of these people who want them back are probably the ones who always complain about rate increases, yet they want to pay these losers to sit in the bar for hours a drink/ Then they go out and put peoples lives at risk.

Reply

Gilbert R Albright Jr

8:58 am on Friday, March 11, 2011

This is just a formallity. Unions have to file a grievance in any potential termination case to protect themselves from being sued by the Union Member for lack of or failure to provide representation. Members pay Union Dues to get representation, if the Union fails to provide it, the Union can be sued for failing to provide the services the member paid for. Breach Of Contract.

Reply

mark pinsker

12:09 pm on Friday, March 11, 2011

Isn't it strange how Fox Murdoch is always playing 'gotcha' with working people? They talk about class warfare but they are pitting the Wal-Mart worker against the Mailman, because they want all workers to have Wal-Mart salaries. That's equalization, tea-party style. I bet Wal-Mart is loaded with tea party types, stupid asses.

Reply

Edith

1:36 pm on Friday, March 11, 2011

It won't take long before Al Sharp and Jessie Jackson get involved. They do love the lime light.
Why do these men think they should get their jobs back? Go cry somewhere else.

Reply

Steve P

10:43 pm on Friday, March 11, 2011

Fire their drunk asses! No brainer!!!

Reply

Steve

1:18 am on Saturday, March 12, 2011

I feel bad for the ptf's and odl's who were packing two hours of these slugs routes every day!

Reply
Comment_arrow

jim jackson

12:21 pm on Sunday, March 13, 2011

I can picture them in my mind calling on their cell phones from the bar telling the boss that it looks like they are going to be running a little bit late

jim jackson

10:54 am on Sunday, March 13, 2011

the unions spend all of their time and money defending those that do not want to do their job or those that get caught doing something wrong that they knew full well was wrong. I once knew a carrier who falsified a medical document when she missed a few days. She had taken a note pad from the doctor's office and wrote on the pad that she had the flu and signed the doctor's name. I had heard that she even misspelled the doctor's name.The supervisor called the doctor and and asked about the note because it looked like it had been written by a pre-schooler. What happened to her? NOTHING!!! She and the boss started seeing each other after work so I guess a deal was worked out. The ones that come to work and do their job do not need representation by the unions.

Reply

AL69

5:31 pm on Sunday, March 13, 2011

@ luvalo...for someone who had been an employee for some 30 years you sound like you should've left 20 years ago. There is no doubt that reinstating them sends a wrong message. They should be terminated, but your spew of negativity for an employer that clothed, fed and enabled you to retire sends the wrong message as well. You've done nothing but bitch about it and shot down everyone that has any type of support for their career. You obviously have nothing better to do with your retirement check than sit and type on blogs with senseless diatribe.

Reply

L. Kellar

11:21 pm on Tuesday, March 15, 2011

We’ve heard these stories before. These two mail carriers knew what they were doing was wrong and they’ll have to pay the price for that, as they should. It is a shame that this will reflect upon the thousands of mail carriers that do an honest day’s work every day.

What I found amazing was the amount of time and effort Fox News put into the investigation and surveillance of two mail carriers drinking on the job. Too bad Jeff Cole/PhillyFox didn’t invest as much effort in helping Philly police capture the Kensington strangler BEFORE he murdered his 3rd victim. No..they were busy covering the big story at McMenimam’s Bar.

Reply

Gabriel

2:25 am on Wednesday, March 16, 2011

This type of outrageous behavior on the part of the labor unions won't stop - filing grievances on behalf of bums - until the membership itself begins filing unfair labor practices against the union for misrepresentation and misuse of union dues. If I were a member of this union, I'd be filing with the NLRB every week and writing my congressional representatives demanding an inquiry into the union and their cozy relationship with the NLRB. The members might even attend a local meeting and pass a motion to withdraw the grievances. Evil can only persist so long as the good people do nothing - make your union represent workers instead of non-workers for a change: file unfair labor practices yourself, write the paper, call talk radio, write your political representatives, and attend local meetings to demand the union change. It only takes a second - do it now. Complete this form and mail it to your regional NLRB office http://www.nlrb.gov/sites/default/files/documents/48/nlrbform508.pdf

Reply

Richard Greifer

7:48 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

The fact remains that these guys didn't run over anyone. I know that these guys did wrong. They do too. They've been out of a job for a year now and they deserved as much, but I am a fellow Postal Worker who has never drank on the job and would like to see them reinstated. We don't know how much they drank. I know Rudy, and he is a fine person who messed up.He was well liked by his customers and was a good mail carrier. Normally, according to our contract agreement,a carrier will get one chance to straighten his life out if he gets caught drinking or abusing drugs on the job, if they agree to get treatment. These guys didn't get that chance because Fox News wanted to make the Postal Service look bad.Fox News is a propaganda organization for the far right. The far right is an enemy of the Postal Service. Just check out the Fox News website and see all the bad stories they carry,i.e.,mailman did this mailman did that. They recently got a mailman fired for going to the bathroom between two houses. the poor guy probably had an emergency. Fox News has an agenda.Too bad the public fell for it. They could have chosen to wait for people outside of bars, but they didn't.These carriers did not get a second chance thanks to Fox News. =May the people involved in this Fox News crusade burn in Hell.

Reply

Richard Greifer

7:54 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

They were not caught driving drunk. Obviously they did drive with alchohol in them, but they were not convicted or even pulled over. They've suffered enough.

Reply

Richard Greifer

8:46 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

As far as you substitute co-workers that trashed your fellow carriers because you have less time in and therefore think you are entitled an easier job. Get some time Yum Yum or else become a boss. Speaking of which, I'm sure management didn't want to fire them either. The only reason they got fired was because it went public.

Reply

Leave a comment